“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a long way they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last seen.
The focus is around the intention to cause injury. This is actually a major trouble: an extremely low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal hasn't challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
Deterrence: The worry of severe outcomes, including capital punishment, is meant to prevent prospective criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is essential in reducing the prevalence of intentional killings.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been of the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally audio, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case in the petitioners for promotion may be regarded, however, we've been obvious within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject for the approval with the competent authority.
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is very well-settled that though thinking about the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must look at the advantage of each of the suitable candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of eligible candidates who are found to get most meritorious among them. Considering that the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked because of the respondent department just to increase favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.
Any court may perhaps find to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
Please note, Should you be seeking a price exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It includes the execution in the convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.
This article delves into the intricacies of the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to deliver a comprehensive understanding of its implications and simple applications.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may very well be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.
Finding reliable free case law sites can be challenging. Many websites involve subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case regulation resources in Pakistan, giving you with read more a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.